Discussion forum | List of registered users | Login/Registration | Home
Voting
K Factors; F2B Community Report & Invitation.pdf

The latest revision of the rule text(Acrobat Reader format PDF)
The Judge guide(Acrobat Reader format PDF)


Get Acrobat Reader(5.2MB)

Discussion forum tree detail


Bruno van Hoek | 30.08.2008 - 22:42:13
Aha! That clears some confusion. I indeed understood something different.
Now on Claus' question:
Yes, I would like to see a reward for building, maybe in a similar vein as the Americans do. We could call this event, in proper English, 'Concours d' Elegance'.

At least one other
[More...]		388
Lou Crane | Re: BOM31.08.2008 - 01:01:29
Hee yourself, Bruno! :-)

Looked up the original AMA CLPA Appearance Scoring scheme. Complicated.

Three categories - realism, workmanship and finish. Each to be awarded from 1 to 4 points. One flier, at least, must get a 10 point total. Totals for these categories for each flier
[More...]		389
Peter Germann | Re: Reward for Building11.09.2008 - 10:02:23
Interesting point, Bruno. Could the reward you would like to see for building (not neccessarily for the quality of it) consist of a small bonus beeing added to the flight score? Small enough to prevent significant discrimination of the bulk of those middle class flyers using ARF's (or RTF's) and lar
[More...]		391
Bruno van Hoek | Re: Reward for Building11.09.2008 - 23:33:49
Uhh, no....
I think it should be in a separate contest.
Under no circumstances anything else than the flying scores should determine the outcome of a flying contest.
But a separate concours d'elegance would be  agreat thing. Anyone who feels like joins in, anyone else doesn't, ea
[More...]		393
Back