Discussion forum | List of registered users | Login/Registration | Home
Voting
K Factors; F2B Community Report & Invitation.pdf

The latest revision of the rule text(Acrobat Reader format PDF)
The Judge guide(Acrobat Reader format PDF)


Get Acrobat Reader(5.2MB)

Discussion forum tree detail


Franz-Xaver Bauer | Reward for Building13.09.2008 - 18:01:16
I think the idea of a separate evaluation of Konstruction, Design or Beauty is extremely useful and worthwhile.
This would probably people of us to motivate built a model itself.
However, such evaluation should not combine with the execution of flight figures.

Reasoning:
Fo
[More...]		399
Peter Germann | Re: Reward for Building14.09.2008 - 11:39:35
Thank you, Xaver, for sharing your point of view on how to support and promote building of airplanes among current and future F2B flyers.

You have absolutely no reason to apologise for language. On the contrary,your effort will undoubtedly motiviate others to let the community know what
[More...]		400
Richard Spurling | Re: Reward for Building15.09.2008 - 09:21:08
Is rewarding building so important?  (theoretical discussion following, I'm not trying to step on anyone's emotions here)

With the current state of technology, at top level competition, models built by someone else are either going to be hideously expensive or a labour of love by the
[More...]		401
Bruno van Hoek | Re: Reward for Building15.09.2008 - 09:48:35
Richard,

I couldn't have said it any better.
This is exactly why we shouldn't want a BOM rule.

Bruno		403
Back